🗞️ Issue 76 // ⏱️ Read Time: 7 min

Hello 👋

A groundbreaking MIT study has been spreading like wildfire across social media, and for good reason. It's the first to peek inside our brains while we're actually using AI tools, revealing some uncomfortable truths about cognitive debt. Today, we're breaking down what this research really means, and more importantly, how you can harness AI's power without sacrificing your mental muscle.

Picture this: You're writing an essay with ChatGPT's help, feeling efficient and productive. But what if I told you that 83% of people who use AI for writing can't accurately quote from essays they wrote just minutes earlier? Meanwhile, only 11% of people writing without AI tools face this same problem. This isn't just about memory. It's about what happens to our brains when we let AI do the heavy lifting.

Why This Research Spread Like Wildfire

This study hit a nerve because it addresses something many of us have quietly wondered: Are we getting smarter with AI, or just feeling smarter? As AI tools become standard in classrooms and workplaces, we're essentially conducting a massive, uncontrolled experiment on human cognition.

The researchers didn't just ask people how they felt after using AI: They actually measured what was happening in the brains of 54 participants while they wrote essays under three different conditions: Using ChatGPT, using search engines, or relying only on their brains.

What makes this research particularly alarming is that the cognitive effects persisted even after participants stopped using AI tools, suggesting potentially lasting changes to how our brains process information.

The Study: Your Brain on ChatGPT

The Experimental Design

Researchers divided participants into three groups:

• Brain-only group: No external tools allowed

• Search Engine group: Could use Google and similar platforms

• ChatGPT group: Could use the AI assistant

Each group completed three sessions under their assigned condition. Then came the twist: In a fourth session, ChatGPT users were switched to brain-only mode, while brain-only users got access to ChatGPT.

Neural Connectivity: A Hierarchy of Mental Engagement

Brain scans revealed a clear hierarchy. The brain-only group showed the strongest neural networks, like a bustling city with multiple highways connecting districts. The numbers are striking: brain-only participants showed theta connectivity scores of 0.644 compared to just 0.331 for search engine users. Even more dramatically, 22 neural connections showed stronger activity in the brain-only group versus only 4 connections favouring the search engine group. Theta band activity is closely linked to working memory load and executive control. In fact, frontal theta power and connectivity increase linearly with the demands on working memory and cognitive control.

ChatGPT users showed the weakest overall neural coupling, with their brains looking more like isolated suburbs with limited connections between regions.

Memory Formation Failing when using ChatGPT

83% of ChatGPT users couldn't accurately quote from essays they had just written, compared to only 11% in other groups. The information never properly integrated into their memory networks, what researchers call "shallow encoding", due to outsourced cognitive processing.

Productivity Comes at a Cost

Here's the flip side: LLM users were 60% more productive overall. However, this efficiency came at a cost: Their brains showed "neural efficiency" patterns, suggesting they were relying on automated processes rather than deep cognitive engagement.

Cognitive Switching: Creating Dependencies

When ChatGPT users were forced to work without AI, their brains showed "under-engagement" - weaker brain wave activity indicating reduced cognitive processing. Their previous AI reliance seemed to create cognitive dependency.

Dictionary: Key Terms Made Simple

We are not brain scientists, so if you aren’t either, we won’t judge you (even if we know that we have at least a couple of brain experts reading this newsletter on a regular basis, so please feel free to add your input!).

Here’s a simple list of the most important words in this study, that we think might be useful for you as you continue your week. 

The Problems with This Study

This is Groundbreaking, But Preliminary

This represents a crucial first: the first research to measure brain activity while people use AI tools in real-time. However, it's not yet peer-reviewed, meaning it hasn't undergone rigorous scientific scrutiny.

Sample Size and Scope Limitations

With 54 participants (only 18 completing the crucial fourth session) from nearby academic institutions, results "cannot be generalized" according to the researchers themselves. The study also didn't break down essay writing into subtasks like idea generation and planning, limiting our understanding of which cognitive processes are most affected.

The Viral Irony

This study spread across social media faster than peer review could catch up. Ironically, many people sharing alarming headlines about AI dependency likely used AI tools to summarise the research without reading the full 142-page paper, demonstrating the very behaviour the study warns against.

Individual Differences: Not All AI Users Are Created Equal

The study revealed crucial differences in how people with varying skill levels use AI tools. Higher-competence learners used AI strategically for active learning, maintaining deep engagement while reducing cognitive strain. Lower-competence learners often relied on AI's immediacy instead of engaging in traditional learning processes.

Academic self-efficacy: The belief in your ability to execute academic tasks, strongly influenced usage patterns. Students with low self-efficacy were more inclined to rely heavily on AI, especially under academic stress.

This creates a concerning cycle: Those who most need to build cognitive skills may be most likely to avoid the mental effort required to develop them.

Cognitive Offloading: The Double-Edged Sword

Cognitive offloading isn't inherently bad. Humans have used external tools for millennia, from writing systems to calculators. The question isn't whether to use AI, but how to use it strategically.

The MIT study reveals that people who completely outsource their thinking to ChatGPT lose independent thinking ability. It's like e-bikes: Rely entirely on the motor and you'll be gasping when the battery dies. The solution isn't to abandon AI. It's to use it more thoughtfully.

Practical Strategies: Keep Your Brain Sharp While Using AI

1. Make AI Your Research Assistant, Not Your Replacement Brain Use AI to map the territory, then explore it yourself. Let it help you understand a topic's structure, then dive deeper using your own critical thinking.

2. Practice "Desirable Difficulties" Deliberately choose harder paths sometimes. Write first drafts by hand, solve problems without immediately reaching for AI, or explain concepts in your own words before checking AI summaries.

3. Implement Metacognitive Monitoring Before using AI, ask: "What do I already know? What specific help do I need?" After using AI, reflect: "What did I learn? How would I explain this without AI's help?"

4. Use the Pomodoro Technique with AI Breaks Structure work in focused 25-minute blocks. Use some blocks for AI-assisted work, others for purely brain-powered thinking.

5. Practice Spaced Repetition Don't just use AI-generated information. Revisit it later without AI assistance. Can you recreate the key insights?

6. Build in Friction Intentionally Sometimes the things that require more mental effort leads to richer understanding and stronger cognitive pathways.

The Path Forward

The MIT study isn't a verdict against AI. It should also not be completely invalidated because of the limitations we pointed out earlier. It's simply a wake-up call about intentional usage. The researchers aren't calling for an AI ban; they're highlighting the need for "deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning."

The most successful AI users of the future won't be those who avoid these tools, but those who know when and how to engage their own cognitive resources alongside AI capabilities. It's about finding the sweet spot between efficiency and mental growth.

As we navigate this landscape, remember: the goal isn't to make AI disappear, but to ensure that if AI does disappear, you're still capable of brilliant thinking on your own.

Until next time.
On behalf of Team Lumiera

Emma - Business Strategist
Allegra - Data Specialist

Lumiera has gathered the brightest people from the technology and policy sectors to give you top-quality advice so you can navigate the new AI Era.

Follow the carefully curated Lumiera podcast playlist to stay informed and challenged on all things AI.